USE CASE
moasy.tech Use Cases, by Role
Same product, different questions — pick the one closest to yours.
It's the same product underneath every page below — what differs is which numbers matter most first, depending on what you're responsible for.
A CTO usually wants one number defensible to the board. A VP of Engineering wants to compare team to team and catch toil before it turns into attrition. A Head of Engineering cares most about reliability posture — MTTR and change failure rate, broken down in a way that reflects how each team actually defines a failure. An Engineering Manager lives closer to the day-to-day: cycle time, WIP, and a per-contributor breakdown built for 1:1s and staffing, not for ranking people. None of these pages describe a different product — just a different entry point into the same one, each with a short FAQ addressing the objection that role tends to raise first. Not sure which fits? CTO and Head of Engineering lean toward board-level and reliability framing; VP of Engineering and Engineering Manager lean toward day-to-day team management — pick whichever question sounds like the one you actually ask.
For CTOs
One deterministic view of engineering health across every team — numbers you can defend to the board, not a subjective self-report.
For VPs of Engineering
Compare team to team, spot toil and overload before it becomes attrition, roll out fast — integrations are read-only, nothing to migrate.
For Heads of Engineering
Reliability posture across teams — MTTR, change failure rate, and failure classification that adapts to how each team actually works.
For Engineering Managers
Day-to-day team health — cycle time, WIP, and a per-contributor breakdown built for 1:1s and staffing, not for ranking people.